Climate Signal

2026 Trajectory / Climate Observability Platform / No Conditionals
2026-09-26 · 05:00 UTC
44 OF 53 SOURCES CURRENT · 9 STALE
9 STALE

The vanishing ice

Arctic sea ice is tracking below the historical floor on an exceptional number of days in 2026. Each km² of missing ice flips reflectivity from ~85% to ~6% — turning the Arctic from a planetary heat mirror into a heat sink.

Arctic Albedo Deficit · Additional Solar Absorption CURRENT 2026-09-24 · 2d old
THE SIGNAL
Ice extent · today
NSIDC
4.99 Mkm²
JAXA AMSR2
4.91 Mkm²
Sensor divergence
+0.08 Mkm²
85% reflected ~94% absorbed
Effective albedo
Today
34%
Historical mean
39%
Deficit
-4.8 ppts
vs historical mean
85% · pure ice
39%
HIST
34%
TODAY
6% · pure ocean
REFLECTIVITY TRANSITION DEFICIT -4.8 PPTS VS HISTORICAL MEAN
Albedo rank · this date
16th lowest
since 1978 · 44 years
Season absorption anomaly
+1984 W/m²·days
excess heat since Apr 1 · 177d · 15.2% above historical
Additional absorption · today
+2.21 W/m²
vs historical mean · per m² Arctic
Energy impact · total
31.0 TW
additional absorption · Arctic-wide
CERES measured albedo
31.6%
planetary · TOA · 2026-06
THE ENERGY
15,064 W/m²·days
+1984 W/m²·days · 15.2% above historical
Historical mean to date
13,080 W/m²·days
Days into season
177d since Apr 1
Rank vs history
16th lowest since 1978 · 44 yrs
Today's instant rate
31.0 TW vs 12-mo mean 73.7 TW
TW = terawatts, trillions of watts of power
THE SYSTEM
An area the size of the Arctic accounts for roughly 7.2% of the planet's entire energy imbalance — both figures as trailing 12-month means.
Arctic deficit · 73.7 TW Remaining EEI · 945.8 TW
Total planetary EEI · 1019.5 TW · CERES 12-month running mean
~4%
Arctic share of
Earth's surface
→
7.2%
Arctic share of
planetary EEI
Ice loss Albedo deficit · ↑ solar absorption
→
Insulation removed Ocean heat + moisture enter atmosphere
→
Arctic warms faster 3–4× global mean rate
→
Jet stream disrupted Blocking highs · drought further south
Ice removal exposes the relatively warm Arctic ocean to cold atmosphere — amplifying warming beyond albedo alone and disrupting mid-latitude weather patterns.
ⓘ methodology & sources SOURCE · seaice_heat_absorbed
Physics: ice reflects ~85% of incident sunlight back to space; open ocean absorbs ~94%. Each million km² of ice lost to the historical per-DOY mean absorbs an additional Δα × S_eff watts, where Δα = 0.79 and S_eff is the all-sky daily mean insolation at 75°N (clear-sky astronomical formula × 0.50 Arctic cloud-transmission factor). Value is 0 during polar night — no additional absorption when there is no sun. Conservative: only counts deficits relative to the 1979–2025 per-DOY mean; a day where 2026 extent exceeds the mean is treated as 0. Note: the '2026 Year to Date · Days Below Historical Floor' card uses a stricter reference — the per-DOY historical minimum — so both cards can be nonzero simultaneously (deficit vs mean, but not yet below the all-time floor for that day). Energy impact W/m² derived from TW ÷ Arctic Ocean area (14.056 million km²). CERES measured albedo (stat strip below) is the global mean planetary albedo including tropics, land, and clouds — not directly comparable to the Arctic regional effective albedo derived from sea ice extent above. Both are shown because they tell different parts of the same story: the Arctic is losing its mirror, and Earth’s total reflectivity is declining as a consequence.
Arctic Sea Ice PIOMAS SUSPENDED NEXTSIM CURRENT Sep 23, 2026
41%
less ice than 02/1979
Rank · this month
2nd lowest
since 1979 · 48 years
Vs historical average
-25.1%
September trend
-3.0 ×10³ km³/decade
neXtSIM · current
6.1 × 10³ km³
Hover the chart to compare PIOMAS and neXtSIM
0 8 16 24 32 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023 2012 2020 Model transition · not continuous PIOMAS · Feb 28 neXtSIM
PIOMAS 2026 neXtSIM 2026 2012 2020 2023
Historical range 1979–2025 Historical mean
neXtSIM and PIOMAS are independent models with different domains and physics — they don't track in lockstep at any given moment. Treat each as a trend indicator in its own right rather than a spliceable continuous series.
ⓘ methodology & sources
Volume integrates thickness × area — a more complete measure of ice loss than extent alone. Extent shows how far the ice reaches; volume shows how much is actually there. VOLUME view: PIOMAS (Schweiger et al. 2011) has been suspended since March 2026 (NCEP/NCAR R1 forcing terminated) — Copernicus Marine's neXtSIM (NERSC, ECMWF-forced) continues the live story, but the two models do not track in lockstep (validated offset swings -26% to +18% by season) so they are shown as separate segments, not a spliced series. EXTENT view: NSIDC v4 daily extent 1978–2025, reference years 2012 (all-time record minimum) and 2020 (second-lowest). VALIDATION view: NSIDC (NASA Team algorithm, DMSP SSMI/S) vs JAXA (Bootstrap algorithm, AMSR2) — independent instrument cross-check, more important than usual with NSIDC on Basic Level of Service due to federal funding cuts.
SOURCE · PIOMAS v2.1 + Copernicus Marine neXtSIM + NSIDC v4 + JAXA/NIPR ADS
2026 Year to Date · Days Below Historical Floor CURRENT
Latest observation: 2026-09-24
2d old · fetched 2026-09-26
40days
Days in 2026 where Arctic extent was below every prior year on that calendar date
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
days below floor within envelope not yet observed
ⓘ methodology & sources
Cumulative count of calendar days in 2026 where the NSIDC daily extent reading fell below the per-day historical minimum across the full 1978–2025 record. Unlike a streak, this total does not reset when extent recovers — a day back inside the envelope stops contributing, but previously counted days remain. Source: NSIDC Sea Ice Index v4.
SOURCE · seaice_days_below_range
▲ Data Infrastructure NSIDC Sea Ice Index — Basic Level of Service. Primary source moved to Basic Level of Service due to funding limitations. Reduced QC, slower issue response, no algorithm updates going forward. Data continues but support degrades. JAXA cross-check elevated in importance. NSIDC service-level notice ↗