The vanishing ice
Arctic sea ice is tracking below the historical floor on an exceptional number of days in 2026. Each km² of missing ice flips reflectivity from ~85% to ~6% — turning the Arctic from a planetary heat mirror into a heat sink.
Arctic Albedo Deficit · Additional Solar Absorption
CURRENT
THE SIGNAL
Ice extent · today
NSIDC
4.99 Mkm²
JAXA AMSR2
4.91 Mkm²
Sensor divergence
+0.08 Mkm²
Effective albedo
Today
34%
Historical mean
39%
Deficit
-4.8 ppts
vs historical mean
Albedo rank · this date
16th lowest
since 1978 · 44 years
Season absorption anomaly
+1984 W/m²·days
excess heat since Apr 1 · 177d · 15.2% above historical
Additional absorption · today
+2.21 W/m²
vs historical mean · per m² Arctic
Energy impact · total
31.0 TW
additional absorption · Arctic-wide
CERES measured albedo
31.6%
planetary · TOA · 2026-06
THE ENERGY
Cumulative absorption · since Apr 1
15,064 W/m²·days
+1984 W/m²·days
· 15.2% above historical
Historical mean to date
13,080 W/m²·days
Days into season
177d since Apr 1
Rank vs history
16th lowest since 1978 · 44 yrs
Today's instant rate
31.0 TW vs 12-mo mean 73.7 TW
TW = terawatts, trillions of watts of power
THE SYSTEM
An area the size of the Arctic accounts for roughly
7.2%
of the planet's entire energy imbalance — both figures as trailing 12-month means.
Surface area vs energy share — proportional
~4%
Arctic share of
Earth's surface
Earth's surface
→
7.2%
Arctic share of
planetary EEI
planetary EEI
Why the Arctic punches above its weight
Ice loss
Albedo deficit · ↑ solar absorption
→
Insulation removed
Ocean heat + moisture enter atmosphere
→
Arctic warms faster
3–4× global mean rate
→
Jet stream disrupted
Blocking highs · drought further south
Ice removal exposes the relatively warm Arctic ocean to cold atmosphere —
amplifying warming beyond albedo alone and disrupting mid-latitude weather patterns.
ⓘ methodology & sources SOURCE · seaice_heat_absorbed
Physics: ice reflects ~85% of incident sunlight back to space; open ocean absorbs ~94%. Each million km² of ice lost to the historical per-DOY mean absorbs an additional Δα × S_eff watts, where Δα = 0.79 and S_eff is the all-sky daily mean insolation at 75°N (clear-sky astronomical formula × 0.50 Arctic cloud-transmission factor). Value is 0 during polar night — no additional absorption when there is no sun. Conservative: only counts deficits relative to the 1979–2025 per-DOY mean; a day where 2026 extent exceeds the mean is treated as 0. Note: the '2026 Year to Date · Days Below Historical Floor' card uses a stricter reference — the per-DOY historical minimum — so both cards can be nonzero simultaneously (deficit vs mean, but not yet below the all-time floor for that day). Energy impact W/m² derived from TW ÷ Arctic Ocean area (14.056 million km²). CERES measured albedo (stat strip below) is the global mean planetary albedo including tropics, land, and clouds — not directly comparable to the Arctic regional effective albedo derived from sea ice extent above. Both are shown because they tell different parts of the same story: the Arctic is losing its mirror, and Earth’s total reflectivity is declining as a consequence.
Arctic Sea Ice
PIOMAS SUSPENDED
NEXTSIM CURRENT
Arctic sea ice volume
41%
less ice than 02/1979
Rank · this month
2nd lowest
since 1979 · 48 years
Vs historical average
-25.1%
September trend
-3.0 ×10³ km³/decade
neXtSIM · current
6.1 × 10³ km³
Hover the chart to compare PIOMAS and neXtSIM
PIOMAS 2026
neXtSIM 2026
2012
2020
2023
Historical range 1979–2025
Historical mean
neXtSIM and PIOMAS are independent models with different domains and physics — they don't track in lockstep at any given moment. Treat each as a trend indicator in its own right rather than a spliceable continuous series.
ⓘ methodology & sources
Volume integrates thickness × area — a more complete measure of ice loss than extent alone. Extent shows how far the ice reaches; volume shows how much is actually there. VOLUME view: PIOMAS (Schweiger et al. 2011) has been suspended since March 2026 (NCEP/NCAR R1 forcing terminated) — Copernicus Marine's neXtSIM (NERSC, ECMWF-forced) continues the live story, but the two models do not track in lockstep (validated offset swings -26% to +18% by season) so they are shown as separate segments, not a spliced series. EXTENT view: NSIDC v4 daily extent 1978–2025, reference years 2012 (all-time record minimum) and 2020 (second-lowest). VALIDATION view: NSIDC (NASA Team algorithm, DMSP SSMI/S) vs JAXA (Bootstrap algorithm, AMSR2) — independent instrument cross-check, more important than usual with NSIDC on Basic Level of Service due to federal funding cuts.
SOURCE · PIOMAS v2.1 + Copernicus Marine neXtSIM + NSIDC v4 + JAXA/NIPR ADS
2026 Year to Date · Days Below Historical Floor
CURRENT
40days
Days in 2026 where Arctic extent was below every prior year on that calendar date
days below floor
within envelope
not yet observed
ⓘ methodology & sources
Cumulative count of calendar days in 2026 where the NSIDC daily extent reading fell below the per-day historical minimum across the full 1978–2025 record. Unlike a streak, this total does not reset when extent recovers — a day back inside the envelope stops contributing, but previously counted days remain. Source: NSIDC Sea Ice Index v4.
SOURCE · seaice_days_below_range
▲ Data Infrastructure
NSIDC Sea Ice Index — Basic Level of Service. Primary source moved to Basic Level of Service due to funding limitations. Reduced QC, slower issue response, no algorithm updates going forward. Data continues but support degrades. JAXA cross-check elevated in importance.
NSIDC service-level notice ↗